Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2649 GP | H228 GP | H121 GP | Prev 3199 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.58 | 10.94 | 10.28 | 11.40 | 13.36 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.37 |
| G | 9 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| A | 9 | 10 | 6 | 15 | 11 |
| PTS | 18 | 18 | 12 | 26 | 22 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 77 | 62 | 43 | 88 | 102 |
| PIM | 26 | 27 | 41 | 8 | 23 |
| Hits | 100 | 92 | 95 | 88 | 115 |
| Blocks | 40 | 32 | 24 | 43 | 51 |
Sample: 49 GP · 438 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 15 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 ran 70% below his 3-year rate last season (0.14 against 0.47).
Goals ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.
PIMs/60 ran 43% above his 3-year rate last season (2.19 against 1.53).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.58 | 10.94 | 13.36 | -18% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.40 | 8.96 | 10.83 | -17% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.37 | -92% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.76 | 3.97 | 5.96 | -33% |
| G/60 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.61 | -33% |
| iSH% | 10.29 | 10.33 | 10.23 | +1% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.63 | 0.62 | +2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.48 | 10.71 | -21% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.74 | 6.07 | -5% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.87 | 3.37 | -15% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 6.91 | 6.31 | 7.91 | -20% |
| IPP | 63.06 | 64.00 | 61.90 | +3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.47 | -70% |
| 2A/60 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.22 | +86% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.37 | -92% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 4.95 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.96 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.37 | 2.19 | 1.53 | +43% |
| Hits/60 | 7.56 | 7.38 | 7.38 | +0% |
| Blks/60 | 2.46 | 2.32 | 2.67 | -13% |