Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2655 GP | H227 GP | H128 GP | Prev 3108 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.10 | 11.17 | 10.63 | 11.57 | 11.39 |
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| G | 11 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 14 |
| A | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| PTS | 26 | 24 | 21 | 26 | 29 |
| PPP | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 103 | 94 | 93 | 95 | 123 |
| PIM | 11 | 18 | 12 | 23 | 9 |
| Hits | 62 | 70 | 106 | 35 | 46 |
| Blocks | 28 | 28 | 21 | 35 | 33 |
Sample: 55 GP · 575 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits ran at a 106 pace in the second half after 35 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 73% below where it started (16.33 in the first half, 4.38 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 ran 25% below his 3-year rate last season (5.94 against 7.97).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.10 | 11.17 | 11.39 | -2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.32 | 10.47 | 10.46 | +0% |
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.76 | -15% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.76 | 5.94 | 7.97 | -25% |
| G/60 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.90 | -30% |
| iSH% | 10.88 | 10.61 | 11.32 | -6% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.88 | 0.70 | +27% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.90 | 14.60 | +2% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.40 | 7.49 | -1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.44 | 3.13 | +10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.37 | 8.05 | 8.95 | -10% |
| IPP | 77.92 | 77.66 | 78.40 | -1% |
| 1A/60 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.38 | +12% |
| 2A/60 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.63 | -34% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.76 | -15% |
| PP iSH% | 7.22 | 0.00 | 12.45 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 6.16 | 8.50 | 5.87 | +45% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.18 | 1.14 | +4% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.90 | 1.25 | 0.63 | +97% |
| Hits/60 | 4.80 | 4.79 | 3.08 | +55% |
| Blks/60 | 1.82 | 1.98 | 2.23 | -11% |