Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2670 GP | H227 GP | H143 GP | Prev 3201 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.16 | 19.08 | 16.99 | 18.40 | 19.76 |
| PP TOI | 3.53 | 3.56 | 3.24 | 3.77 | 3.51 |
| G | 24 | 22 | 23 | 21 | 27 |
| A | 32 | 38 | 34 | 40 | 35 |
| PTS | 56 | 60 | 58 | 61 | 63 |
| PPP | 19 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 22 |
| SOG | 234 | 227 | 208 | 239 | 267 |
| PIM | 47 | 38 | 39 | 37 | 51 |
| Hits | ▼118 | 124 | 115 | 130 | 151 |
| Blocks | 52 | 40 | 35 | 43 | 56 |
Sample: 70 GP · 888 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): His hit rate is the one peripheral where we read high rather than low, above both his own pace and the outside number, so it comes down.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting blocks 30% above last season, 40 to 52.
PP TOI sits in the 96th percentile league-wide (3.56).
PP ixG/60 finished the year 32% above where it started (2.93 in the first half, 3.88 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 32% below his 3-year rate last season (0.41 against 0.61).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.16 | 19.08 | 19.76 | -3% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.48 | 12.70 | 12.79 | -1% |
| PP TOI | 3.53 | 3.56 | 3.51 | +2% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.97 | 7.97 | 9.20 | -13% |
| G/60 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.70 | -3% |
| iSH% | 8.17 | 8.53 | 7.59 | +12% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.86 | 0.87 | -1% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.92 | 15.52 | -4% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.56 | 8.01 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.98 | 4.50 | -12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.88 | 11.02 | 9.11 | +21% |
| IPP | 61.47 | 57.41 | 66.42 | -14% |
| 1A/60 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.61 | -32% |
| 2A/60 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.58 | +27% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.53 | 3.56 | 3.51 | +2% |
| PP iSH% | 14.97 | 13.70 | 15.33 | -11% |
| PP SOG/60 | 13.03 | 12.26 | 16.09 | -24% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.26 | 3.73 | -13% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.06 | 1.62 | 1.91 | -15% |
| Hits/60 | 6.89 | 6.41 | 7.44 | -14% |
| Blks/60 | 1.69 | 1.49 | 1.98 | -25% |