Per 82 GP	2026-27projection	2025-2674 GP	H237 GP	H137 GP	Prev 360 GP · 1y
TOI	13.05	13.09	13.28	12.26	12.79
PP TOI	0.84	0.99	0.77	1.20	0.47
G	12	12	15	9	11
A	20	24	27	22	16
PTS	32	36	42	31	27
PPP	3	2	2	2	3
SOG	90	85	105	65	83
PIM	26	45	35	55	19
Hits	100	94	105	83	97
Blocks	30	32	27	38	27

Sample: 74 GP · 856 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)

204Dominic James-31

205Cole Reinhardt-31

206Emmitt Finnie-32

207Gage Goncalves-32

208Steven Lorentz-32

209Andre Burakovsky-32

210Anthony Duclair-33

offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

Second-half surge

all5v5

Goals ran at a 15 pace in the second half after 9 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate

PIMs/60

PIMs/60 ran 147% above his 3-year rate last season (2.87 against 1.16).

Second-half surge

SOG/60

SOG/60 finished the year 48% above where it started (3.67 in the first half, 5.42 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Below his 3-year rate

1A/60

1A/60 ran 28% below his 3-year rate last season (0.42 against 0.58).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Easton CowanC,RW · Toronto Maple Leafs84% match
shared: Hits
Yakov TreninLW,RW · Minnesota Wild83% match
shared: Hits
Zach BensonLW · Buffalo Sabres82% match
Alexis LafrenièreLW,RW · New York Rangers81% match
shared: Hits

Complementary Forward

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Gage Goncalves is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 4
fills: PPP, SOG, G, A

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · Jon Cooper (TBL)

Last year: Jon Cooper full season — no change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
TOI	13.05	13.09	12.79	+2%
5v5 TOI	12.26	11.57	12.11	-5%
PP TOI	0.84	0.99	0.47	+110%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 17 · 20

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 13.05: holds last year's role
5v5 TOI → 12.26: same coach (Jon Cooper) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 12.2, Q4 13.5) over the full-year 11.6
PP TOI → 0.84: role tapered late (Q4 1.0 vs 1.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
SOG/60	4.84	4.56	4.54	+0%
G/60	0.74	0.77	0.58	+33%
iSH%	15.32	16.89	12.78	+32%
ixG/60	–	0.54	0.47	+15%
iCF/60	–	8.62	8.83	-2%
iSCF/60	–	5.33	4.95	+8%
iHDCF/60	–	3.15	2.23	+41%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 17 · 20

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.54 (42nd pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.47 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.

TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.49→0.59 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
on-ice SH%	14.28	16.23	10.70	+52%
IPP	50.99	49.03	56.44	-13%
1A/60	0.49	0.42	0.58	-28%
2A/60	0.51	0.84	0.33	+155%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 17 · 20

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 16.2% vs a 10.7% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 3.15 vs 2.23) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.84 vs 3-yr 0.33) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PP TOI	0.84	0.99	0.47	+110%
PP iSH%	15.60	0.00	20.00	-100%
PP SOG/60	6.71	5.76	10.65	-46%
PP ixG/60	–	1.22	1.42	-14%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 17 · 20

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskPP role projected down: 1.0→0.8 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 1.0 vs 1.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PIMs/60	2.07	2.87	1.16	+147%
Hits/60	5.88	5.89	5.86	+1%
Blks/60	1.77	2.03	1.40	+45%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 17 · 20

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextHits role-stable at 5.89/60 (68th pct league-wide) → 5.88 projected.

RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 2.22/60 and 2nd-half 1.44 below the 2.03 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.77/60, weighting the recent decline over the 1.40 3-yr mark.

TailwindFights / takes majors (0.07/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.