🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Steven Lorentz

TOR · Age 30.3 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′4″, 206 lb · Draft 2015, 186th overall (CAR)
TORteam
C,LW,RWposition
177position rank
614skater rank
-32overall
-50offense
18peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2671 GPH237 GPH134 GPPrev 3198 GP · 3y
TOI11.6611.8711.6811.8110.73
PP TOI0.020.010.000.020.15
G887108
A111310169
PTS1921172517
PPP00000
SOG8581778590
PIM1418112614
Hits174179175183166
Blocks5755585352

Sample: 71 GP · 674 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
ixG/60
3-yr 0.720.89Q1Q2Q3Q4

ixG/60 finished the year 43% above where it started (0.53 in the first half, 0.76 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half fade
PIM
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 11 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.

Bottom of the league
PP TOI
0.0222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

PP TOI sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (0.01).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Steven Lorentz is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Jim Hiller (TOR) new voice
Last year: Craig Berube full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI11.6611.8710.73+11%
5v5 TOI9.509.499.37+1%
PP TOI0.020.010.15-92%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 19 · 22 · 15
TOI*
3-yr 10.7311.93Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 9.379.69Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.150.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
11.6622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
9.5022-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/605.435.436.30-14%
G/600.430.450.49-8%
iSH%7.968.297.72+7%
ixG/600.640.72-11%
iCF/609.7011.90-18%
iSCF/605.346.63-19%
iHDCF/602.763.69-25%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 19 · 22 · 15
SOG/60
3-yr 6.306.19Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 7.7213.41Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.720.89Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 11.9011.97Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 6.636.19Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.694.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.4322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
8.2922-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.6422-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
9.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
5.3422-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
2.7622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
8522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextFinishing looks earned: iSH% 8.3% sits near the 7.7% 3-yr mark with 5v5 ixG/60 0.64 (54th pct league-wide) — goals held close to last year.
RiskShot volume down 14% (5v5 SOG/60 5.43 vs 6.30) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.53→0.76 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.469.466.41+48%
IPP64.9162.6271.89-13%
1A/600.400.450.26+73%
2A/600.440.450.42+7%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 19 · 22 · 15
1A/60
3-yr 0.260.41Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.420.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 9.5% vs a 6.4% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.020.010.15-92%
PP iSH%n/a25.00
PP SOG/602.000.008.00-100%
PP ixG/600.001.46-100%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 19 · 22 · 15
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.150.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 8.000.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.460.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0122-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.0→0.0 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/600.991.251.00+24%
Hits/6013.1513.4412.71+6%
Blks/603.663.563.64-2%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 19 · 22 · 15
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.000.83Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 12.7114.86Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.644.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.2522-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
13.4422-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
17422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
5722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindElite hits volume (92nd pct) and role-stable — a bankable hits floor (13.15/60 projected).
TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 4.54/60 and 2nd-half 3.89 vs a 3.56 season rate (3.64 3-yr) (72nd pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 3.66/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.