Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3215 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.23 | 13.33 | 13.23 | 13.12 | 13.43 |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.09 |
| G | 8 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| A | 13 | 16 | 15 | 17 | 11 |
| PTS | 21 | 22 | 23 | 22 | 21 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 103 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 107 |
| PIM | 31 | 41 | 14 | 66 | 56 |
| Hits | 116 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 193 |
| Blocks | 47 | 47 | 49 | 45 | 48 |
Sample: 82 GP · 851 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 14 pace in the second half after 66 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 59% above where it started (4.13 in the first half, 6.55 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 51% above his 3-year rate last season (0.70 against 0.46).
Hits/60 ran 51% below his 3-year rate last season (5.92 against 12.05).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.23 | 13.33 | 13.43 | -1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.33 | 10.38 | 11.40 | -9% |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.09 | -31% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.57 | 6.77 | 6.30 | +8% |
| G/60 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.49 | -28% |
| iSH% | 6.65 | 5.17 | 7.73 | -33% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.63 | 0.64 | -2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.55 | 12.32 | +2% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.99 | 6.10 | -2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.75 | 2.74 | +0% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.84 | 8.01 | 7.32 | +9% |
| IPP | 62.52 | 64.38 | 56.80 | +13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.46 | +51% |
| 2A/60 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.15 | +135% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.09 | -31% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 33.30 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 9.58 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.41 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.92 | 2.61 | 3.14 | -17% |
| Hits/60 | 7.95 | 5.92 | 12.05 | -51% |
| Blks/60 | 2.26 | 2.19 | 2.37 | -8% |