Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2662 GP | H223 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3137 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.54 | 13.21 | 13.26 | 12.64 | 15.40 |
| PP TOI | 1.30 | 1.26 | 1.44 | 1.16 | 1.66 |
| G | 15 | 16 | 29 | 8 | 20 |
| A | 16 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 17 |
| PTS | 31 | 36 | 50 | 27 | 37 |
| PPP | 8 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 9 |
| SOG | 111 | 98 | 96 | 99 | 139 |
| PIM | 18 | 16 | 14 | 17 | 28 |
| Hits | 22 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 57 |
| Blocks | 46 | 56 | 66 | 50 | 38 |
Sample: 62 GP · 718 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 29 pace in the second half after 8 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 112% above where it started (7.89 in the first half, 16.70 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 ran 76% below his 3-year rate last season (0.75 against 3.11).
PP TOI ran 24% below his 3-year rate last season (1.26 against 1.66).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.54 | 13.21 | 15.40 | -14% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.67 | 11.59 | 13.12 | -12% |
| PP TOI | 1.30 | 1.26 | 1.66 | -24% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 6.08 | -22% |
| G/60 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.80 | -16% |
| iSH% | 13.54 | 14.08 | 13.14 | +7% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.48 | 0.73 | -34% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.44 | 11.48 | -9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.51 | 6.84 | -19% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.00 | 3.91 | -49% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.39 | 9.63 | 8.91 | +8% |
| IPP | 68.17 | 74.79 | 59.88 | +25% |
| 1A/60 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.53 | +26% |
| 2A/60 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.20 | +108% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.30 | 1.26 | 1.66 | -24% |
| PP iSH% | 22.11 | 23.52 | 21.09 | +12% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.08 | 13.01 | 10.00 | +30% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.77 | 1.82 | +52% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 1.07 | -37% |
| Hits/60 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 3.11 | -76% |
| Blks/60 | 3.90 | 3.34 | 2.07 | +61% |