Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2658 GP | H223 GP | H135 GP | Prev 3206 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.67 | 14.89 | 14.37 | 14.18 | 13.82 |
| PP TOI | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 0.08 |
| G | 16 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 15 |
| A | 16 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 14 |
| PTS | 32 | 31 | 37 | 27 | 29 |
| PPP | 3 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 103 | 92 | 95 | 90 | 101 |
| PIM | 54 | 58 | 75 | 47 | 52 |
| Hits | 133 | 141 | 136 | 145 | 125 |
| Blocks | 50 | 27 | 34 | 22 | 55 |
Sample: 58 GP · 729 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting blocks 85% above last season, 27 to 50.
Assists ran at a 19 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 90% above his 3-year rate last season (21.90 against 11.50).
ixG/60 finished the year 50% above where it started (0.56 in the first half, 0.85 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.67 | 14.89 | 13.82 | +8% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.49 | 12.57 | 12.37 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.08 | +700% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.59 | 4.52 | 5.53 | -18% |
| G/60 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.64 | +56% |
| iSH% | 15.87 | 21.90 | 11.50 | +90% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.65 | 0.67 | -3% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.56 | 10.15 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.33 | 6.76 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.54 | 3.37 | +5% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.17 | 9.32 | 8.97 | +4% |
| IPP | 58.02 | 59.92 | 55.48 | +8% |
| 1A/60 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.45 | -44% |
| 2A/60 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.23 | +7% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.08 | +700% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 6.92 | 9.57 | 7.19 | +33% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.91 | 0.58 | +57% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.33 | 3.37 | 2.87 | +17% |
| Hits/60 | 7.60 | 7.98 | 7.04 | +13% |
| Blks/60 | 1.66 | 1.23 | 2.75 | -55% |