Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2670 GP | H239 GP | H131 GP | Prev 3169 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.57 | 22.84 | 20.91 | 21.52 | 21.84 |
| PP TOI | 1.74 | 1.38 | 1.11 | 1.72 | 2.72 |
| G | 9 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| A | 43 | 34 | 31 | 38 | 58 |
| PTS | 52 | 46 | 43 | 50 | 68 |
| PPP | 10 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 21 |
| SOG | 151 | 151 | 125 | 184 | 179 |
| PIM | 35 | 28 | 42 | 10 | 24 |
| Hits | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 15 |
| Blocks | 109 | 102 | 91 | 115 | 116 |
Sample: 70 GP · 1,281 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting power play points 67% above last season, 6 to 10.
PP TOI ran 49% below his 3-year rate last season (1.38 against 2.72).
iSH% ran 51% above his 3-year rate last season (6.52 against 4.32).
Shots ran at a 125 pace in the second half after 184 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.57 | 22.84 | 21.84 | +5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.27 | 18.31 | 18.00 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 1.74 | 1.38 | 2.72 | -49% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.98 | 5.06 | 5.58 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.24 | +37% |
| iSH% | 4.98 | 6.52 | 4.32 | +51% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.26 | 0.27 | -4% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.36 | 13.61 | -9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.04 | 3.67 | -17% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.51 | 0.42 | +23% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.04 | 8.78 | 9.53 | -8% |
| IPP | 50.24 | 48.16 | 54.14 | -11% |
| 1A/60 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.67 | -45% |
| 2A/60 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.65 | -6% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.74 | 1.38 | 2.72 | -49% |
| PP iSH% | 12.39 | 33.24 | 9.63 | +245% |
| PP SOG/60 | 4.09 | 3.73 | 8.08 | -54% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.44 | 0.59 | -26% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.26 | 0.94 | 0.98 | -5% |
| Hits/60 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.49 | -82% |
| Blks/60 | 3.30 | 2.86 | 4.24 | -33% |