Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2654 GP | H235 GP | H119 GP | Prev 3212 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.63 | 12.65 | 12.07 | 12.56 | 15.56 |
| PP TOI | 0.96 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 1.33 | 1.47 |
| G | 10 | 6 | 7 | -0 | 16 |
| A | 16 | 17 | 12 | 30 | 22 |
| PTS | 26 | 23 | 19 | 30 | 38 |
| PPP | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| SOG | 82 | 74 | 61 | 92 | 124 |
| PIM | 51 | 67 | 61 | 87 | 58 |
| Hits | 172 | 196 | 193 | 222 | 208 |
| Blocks | 37 | 50 | 43 | 52 | 39 |
Sample: 54 GP · 548 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 12 pace in the second half after 30 in the first, per 82 games.
PP ixG/60 finished the year 69% below where it started (1.44 in the first half, 0.45 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Blks/60 ran 78% above his 3-year rate last season (3.39 against 1.90).
PIMs/60 ran 54% above his 3-year rate last season (4.59 against 2.99).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.63 | 12.65 | 15.56 | -19% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.10 | 10.16 | 12.22 | -17% |
| PP TOI | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.47 | -28% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.29 | 4.48 | 5.63 | -20% |
| G/60 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.58 | -24% |
| iSH% | 10.07 | 9.82 | 10.25 | -4% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.54 | 0.63 | -15% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.33 | 8.80 | -17% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.92 | 5.56 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.73 | 3.27 | -16% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.83 | 10.01 | 9.61 | +4% |
| IPP | 57.59 | 54.79 | 61.01 | -10% |
| 1A/60 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.51 | -14% |
| 2A/60 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.39 | -16% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.47 | -28% |
| PP iSH% | 17.36 | 0.00 | 22.26 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 5.62 | 5.26 | 10.38 | -49% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.22 | 2.53 | -52% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.75 | 4.59 | 2.99 | +54% |
| Hits/60 | 12.42 | 13.89 | 11.86 | +17% |
| Blks/60 | 2.79 | 3.39 | 1.90 | +78% |