Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2658 GP | H234 GP | H124 GP | Prev 3thin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 8.82 | 8.82 | 9.30 | 8.00 | – |
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | – |
| G | 4 | 4 | -0 | 10 | – |
| A | 8 | 8 | 14 | -0 | – |
| PTS | 12 | 13 | 14 | 10 | – |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| SOG | 76 | 76 | 81 | 70 | – |
| PIM | 78 | 78 | 77 | 79 | – |
| Hits | 226 | 235 | 224 | 249 | – |
| Blocks | 38 | 38 | 41 | 34 | – |
Sample: 58 GP · 504 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI sits in the 2th percentile league-wide (0.01).
Hits/60 finished the year 29% below where it started (24.02 in the first half, 16.96 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 sits in the 99th percentile league-wide (1.14).
Blocks ran at a 41 pace in the second half after 34 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 8.82 | 8.82 | n/a | |
| 5v5 TOI | 8.64 | 8.70 | n/a | |
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | n/a |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.30 | 6.30 | n/a | |
| G/60 | 0.36 | 0.36 | n/a | |
| iSH% | 5.71 | 5.71 | n/a | |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.14 | n/a | |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.87 | n/a | |
| iSCF/60 | – | 9.51 | n/a | |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 5.95 | n/a |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.96 | 7.96 | n/a | |
| IPP | 50.00 | 50.00 | n/a | |
| 1A/60 | 0.59 | 0.59 | n/a | |
| 2A/60 | 0.12 | 0.12 | n/a |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | n/a | |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | n/a |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 6.54 | 6.54 | n/a | |
| Hits/60 | 19.18 | 19.74 | n/a | |
| Blks/60 | 3.21 | 3.21 | n/a |