Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H242 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3233 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.34 | 12.91 | 11.20 | 14.23 | 16.34 |
| PP TOI | 1.22 | 1.17 | 1.03 | 1.32 | 1.78 |
| G | 14 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 17 |
| A | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 21 |
| PTS | 30 | 33 | 29 | 37 | 38 |
| PPP | 7 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| SOG | 132 | 132 | 119 | 145 | 177 |
| PIM | 14 | 16 | 12 | 21 | 21 |
| Hits | 140 | 155 | 161 | 149 | 115 |
| Blocks | 46 | 32 | 30 | 34 | 70 |
Sample: 82 GP · 940 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting blocks 44% above last season, 32 to 46.
Power play points ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 ran 64% above his 3-year rate last season (9.77 against 5.97).
iSH% finished the year 40% above where it started (8.32 in the first half, 11.67 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.34 | 12.91 | 16.34 | -21% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.09 | 11.46 | 13.56 | -15% |
| PP TOI | 1.22 | 1.17 | 1.78 | -34% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.96 | 6.96 | 7.56 | -8% |
| G/60 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.63 | +23% |
| iSH% | 10.01 | 11.06 | 8.29 | +33% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.81 | 0.80 | +1% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.30 | 15.16 | -6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.85 | 7.98 | -2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.19 | 3.25 | -2% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.63 | 10.08 | 9.08 | +11% |
| IPP | 56.72 | 55.75 | 57.90 | -4% |
| 1A/60 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.59 | -3% |
| 2A/60 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.23 | +14% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.22 | 1.17 | 1.78 | -34% |
| PP iSH% | 17.38 | 26.30 | 15.56 | +69% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.61 | 11.90 | 11.17 | +7% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.97 | 1.83 | +7% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.81 | 1.02 | 0.97 | +6% |
| Hits/60 | 9.08 | 9.77 | 5.97 | +64% |
| Blks/60 | 2.58 | 1.91 | 3.69 | -48% |