Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2680 GP | H240 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3228 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.77 | 20.57 | 21.18 | 18.84 | 21.67 |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| G | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| A | 19 | 16 | 19 | 13 | 18 |
| PTS | 23 | 21 | 24 | 16 | 22 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 81 | 62 | 68 | 57 | 95 |
| PIM | 28 | 22 | 18 | 27 | 31 |
| Hits | 129 | 114 | 138 | 90 | 147 |
| Blocks | 132 | 136 | 134 | 138 | 137 |
Sample: 80 GP · 1,411 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits ran at a 138 pace in the second half after 90 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 19 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 40% above his 3-year rate last season (5.18 against 3.71).
SOG/60 ran 29% below his 3-year rate last season (2.51 against 3.53).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.77 | 20.57 | 21.67 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.25 | 17.64 | 18.33 | -4% |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | +1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.51 | 2.51 | 3.53 | -29% |
| G/60 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -1% |
| iSH% | 4.15 | 5.18 | 3.71 | +40% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.16 | 0.18 | -9% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.23 | 8.89 | -19% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.13 | 2.45 | -13% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.51 | 0.45 | +14% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.64 | 8.79 | 7.96 | +11% |
| IPP | 34.20 | 34.22 | 34.13 | +0% |
| 1A/60 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.21 | +78% |
| 2A/60 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.42 | -37% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | +1% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 50.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 6.36 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.68 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 1.15 | -41% |
| Hits/60 | 4.86 | 4.46 | 5.38 | -17% |
| Blks/60 | 4.40 | 4.68 | 3.98 | +18% |