Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2676 GP | H236 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3197 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.48 | 21.96 | 21.35 | 20.22 | 18.16 |
| PP TOI | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| G | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| A | 16 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 14 |
| PTS | 19 | 19 | 22 | 16 | 16 |
| PPP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 70 | 62 | 58 | 65 | 72 |
| PIM | 58 | 51 | 41 | 60 | 63 |
| Hits | 135 | 123 | 128 | 119 | 135 |
| Blocks | 105 | 107 | 87 | 125 | 109 |
Sample: 76 GP · 1,359 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (7.83 against 3.10).
Assists ran at a 20 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
Blks/60 finished the year 44% below where it started (3.92 in the first half, 2.20 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 sits in the 3th percentile league-wide (0.10).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.48 | 21.96 | 18.16 | +21% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.64 | 17.88 | 15.78 | +13% |
| PP TOI | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.07 | +280% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.26 | 2.30 | 3.12 | -26% |
| G/60 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.10 | +86% |
| iSH% | 4.52 | 7.83 | 3.10 | +152% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.10 | 0.12 | -16% |
| iCF/60 | – | 6.00 | 8.63 | -30% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.50 | 1.93 | -22% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.26 | 0.21 | +23% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.08 | 9.09 | 9.06 | +0% |
| IPP | 28.43 | 28.70 | 27.93 | +3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.31 | -58% |
| 2A/60 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.31 | +14% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.07 | +280% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 33.32 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.90 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.12 | 0.46 | -74% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.18 | 1.90 | 2.59 | -27% |
| Hits/60 | 4.97 | 4.46 | 5.73 | -22% |
| Blks/60 | 2.90 | 3.13 | 3.96 | -21% |