Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2634 GP | H218 GP | H116 GP | Prev 3147 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.18 | 13.39 | 11.33 | 14.76 | 16.85 |
| PP TOI | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| A | 14 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| PTS | 18 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 28 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 108 | 111 | 95 | 120 | 126 |
| PIM | 93 | 121 | 224 | 46 | 86 |
| Hits | 81 | 60 | 44 | 72 | 108 |
| Blocks | 67 | 92 | 92 | 107 | 70 |
Sample: 34 GP · 421 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 224 pace in the second half after 46 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting hits 35% above last season, 60 to 81.
PP TOI sits in the 1th percentile league-wide (0.00).
TOI finished the year 23% below where it started (14.72 in the first half, 11.33 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.18 | 13.39 | 16.85 | -21% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.81 | 12.40 | 15.62 | -21% |
| PP TOI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | -100% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.41 | 6.41 | 5.43 | +18% |
| G/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | -100% |
| iSH% | 2.39 | 0.00 | 4.79 | -100% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.24 | 0.22 | +10% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.38 | 12.85 | +12% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.42 | 3.22 | +6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.85 | 0.42 | +102% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.96 | 8.99 | 8.85 | +2% |
| IPP | 17.39 | 11.57 | 45.62 | -75% |
| 1A/60 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.52 | -100% |
| 2A/60 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.39 | -28% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | -100% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 8.34 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 9.76 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.81 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 6.95 | 6.83 | 4.00 | +71% |
| Hits/60 | 4.01 | 3.56 | 4.83 | -26% |
| Blks/60 | 4.28 | 4.84 | 3.19 | +52% |