🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Kirby Dach

MTL · Age 25.5 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′4″, 212 lb · Draft 2019, 3rd overall (CHI)
MTLteam
C,RWposition
88position rank
312skater rank
5overall
-21offense
26peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2637 GPH222 GPH115 GPPrev 3115 GP · 2y
TOI14.4313.6613.1913.4417.10
PP TOI1.761.371.241.572.95
G1418112717
A1915191126
PTS3333303843
PPP944516
SOG11210493120136
PIM5469568759
Hits104117119115109
Blocks4866587951

Sample: 37 GP · 440 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
A
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 19 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
iSH%
17.7822-2323-2424-2525-26

iSH% ran 86% above his 3-year rate last season (17.78 against 9.57).

Second-half fade
G
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Goals ran at a 11 pace in the second half after 27 in the first, per 82 games.

Below his 3-year rate
PP TOI
1.7622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

PP TOI ran 54% below his 3-year rate last season (1.37 against 2.95).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Ridly GreigC,LW,RW · Ottawa Senators93% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
  • Erik HaulaC,LW · Los Angeles Kings90% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Jake NeighboursLW,RW · St. Louis Blues90% match
    shared: Hits, Blocks, PIM
  • Scott LaughtonLW · Los Angeles Kings89% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits, PIM
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Kirby Dach is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
    fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
    fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
    fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
  • Kyle ConnorLW · Winnipeg Jetscovers 4
    fills: SOG, G, A, PPP
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Martin St. Louis (MTL)
Last year: Martin St. Louis full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI14.4313.6617.10-20%
5v5 TOI11.9911.9013.17-10%
PP TOI1.761.372.95-54%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 0 · 13 · 9
TOI*
3-yr 17.1011.55Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 13.179.78Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 2.951.75Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
14.4322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
11.9922-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
1.7622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/606.066.136.22-1%
G/600.891.090.60+83%
iSH%14.6617.789.57+86%
ixG/600.810.80+1%
iCF/6011.3110.57+7%
iSCF/606.686.93-4%
iHDCF/603.544.00-11%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 0 · 13 · 9
SOG/60
3-yr 6.225.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 9.570.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.800.67Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 10.579.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 6.934.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.001.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
6.1322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
17.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.8122-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
11.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
6.6822-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.5422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
11222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 17.8% vs a 9.6% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.81 (78th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 14.7% pulls the goal rate ~18% down.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 1.00 (1st half) to 0.68 (2nd).

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%10.0511.968.77+36%
IPP56.0959.0052.53+12%
1A/600.150.140.28-49%
2A/600.450.550.36+54%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 0 · 13 · 9
1A/60
3-yr 0.280.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.360.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.1422-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.5522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
3322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 12.0% vs a 8.8% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.
RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.55 vs 3-yr 0.36) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI1.761.372.95-54%
PP iSH%16.910.0029.15-100%
PP SOG/602.902.374.24-44%
PP ixG/601.441.02+41%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 0 · 13 · 9
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 2.951.75Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 4.243.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.022.66Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
1.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
2.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
1.4422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 1.4→1.8 PP TOI/gp (same coach (Martin St. Louis) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 1.3, Q4 1.8) over the full-year 1.4) — the biggest PPP lever.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (0.0% vs 29.1%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.494.232.73+55%
Hits/607.087.225.70+27%
Blks/603.323.952.49+58%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  15 · 0 · 13 · 9
PIMs/60
3-yr 2.732.73Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 5.7011.59Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.494.09Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
4.2322-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
7.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.9522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
5422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
10422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
4822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindHits surging late: Q4 11.59/60 and 2nd-half 8.38 vs a 7.22 season rate (5.70 3-yr) (76th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 7.08/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 3.95/60 (81st pct league-wide) → 3.32 projected.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.14/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.