Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H243 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3235 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.58 | 11.54 | 11.89 | 10.92 | 11.87 |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| G | 9 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| A | 13 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 13 |
| PTS | 22 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 23 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 71 | 67 | 64 | 70 | 78 |
| PIM | 50 | 55 | 38 | 74 | 59 |
| Hits | 269 | 270 | 287 | 251 | 277 |
| Blocks | 41 | 43 | 32 | 56 | 41 |
Sample: 82 GP · 883 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 finished the year 79% above where it started (0.35 in the first half, 0.64 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 finished the year 52% below where it started (0.75 in the first half, 0.36 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (18.27).
iSH% ran 23% below his 3-year rate last season (9.15 against 11.84).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.58 | 11.54 | 11.87 | -3% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.87 | 10.78 | 11.44 | -6% |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | +182% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.39 | 4.48 | 4.89 | -8% |
| G/60 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.58 | -29% |
| iSH% | 10.71 | 9.15 | 11.84 | -23% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.51 | 0.55 | -8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.30 | 9.19 | +1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.02 | 5.67 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.85 | 3.08 | -7% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.03 | 6.49 | 7.99 | -19% |
| IPP | 67.71 | 69.87 | 64.84 | +8% |
| 1A/60 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.52 | +5% |
| 2A/60 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.27 | -48% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | +182% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9.84 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.83 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.25 | 3.73 | 3.75 | -0% |
| Hits/60 | 18.00 | 18.27 | 17.59 | +4% |
| Blks/60 | 2.70 | 2.85 | 2.48 | +15% |