Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2647 GP | H233 GP | H114 GP | Prev 3163 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.57 | 11.85 | 11.42 | 12.51 | 10.41 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| G | 12 | 16 | 7 | 40 | 12 |
| A | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| PTS | 20 | 23 | 13 | 48 | 20 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 140 | 98 | 91 | 122 | 137 |
| PIM | 31 | 33 | 27 | 51 | 26 |
| Hits | 238 | 244 | 251 | 233 | 216 |
| Blocks | 31 | 40 | 38 | 43 | 27 |
Sample: 47 GP · 513 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 7 pace in the second half after 40 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 107% above his 3-year rate last season (15.60 against 7.53).
Points ran at a 13 pace in the second half after 48 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting blocks 22% below last season, 40 to 31.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.57 | 11.85 | 10.41 | +14% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.72 | 10.92 | 9.89 | +10% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -76% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.96 | 5.96 | 9.86 | -40% |
| G/60 | 0.67 | 0.93 | 0.74 | +25% |
| iSH% | 10.92 | 15.60 | 7.53 | +107% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.80 | 0.90 | -11% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.39 | 17.97 | -31% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.90 | 9.23 | -25% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.51 | 3.83 | -8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.81 | 12.43 | 6.40 | +94% |
| IPP | 59.24 | 55.13 | 65.95 | -16% |
| 1A/60 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.41 | -100% |
| 2A/60 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.15 | +136% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -76% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 40.02 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 16.81 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 3.71 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.05 | 2.22 | 1.71 | +30% |
| Hits/60 | 16.13 | 16.36 | 15.78 | +4% |
| Blks/60 | 2.12 | 2.34 | 1.84 | +27% |