Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2671 GP | H238 GP | H133 GP | Prev 3244 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.05 | 17.19 | 15.31 | 17.54 | 16.10 |
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 2.08 | 1.17 | 3.13 | 2.05 |
| G | 15 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 19 |
| A | 22 | 24 | 14 | 36 | 29 |
| PTS | 37 | 38 | 27 | 51 | 48 |
| PPP | 8 | 12 | 2 | 22 | 11 |
| SOG | 154 | 158 | 137 | 182 | 181 |
| PIM | 39 | 39 | 30 | 49 | 40 |
| Hits | 50 | 52 | 49 | 56 | 50 |
| Blocks | 38 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 36 |
Sample: 71 GP · 919 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 2 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI finished the year 62% below where it started (3.13 in the first half, 1.18 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 ran 53% above his 3-year rate last season (11.36 against 7.43).
SOG/60 ran 29% below his 3-year rate last season (6.07 against 8.54).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.05 | 17.19 | 16.10 | +7% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.64 | 12.95 | 12.90 | +0% |
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 2.08 | 2.05 | +1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.07 | 6.07 | 8.54 | -29% |
| G/60 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.75 | -30% |
| iSH% | 8.66 | 8.57 | 8.74 | -2% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.67 | 0.76 | -12% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.05 | 15.27 | -15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.31 | 8.03 | -9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.26 | 3.09 | +6% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.29 | 6.63 | 8.48 | -22% |
| IPP | 74.05 | 71.58 | 77.38 | -7% |
| 1A/60 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.67 | -12% |
| 2A/60 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.42 | -52% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 2.08 | 2.05 | +1% |
| PP iSH% | 12.35 | 7.13 | 16.14 | -56% |
| PP SOG/60 | 8.94 | 11.36 | 7.43 | +53% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.64 | 1.41 | +16% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.78 | 1.96 | 2.08 | -6% |
| Hits/60 | 2.70 | 2.68 | 2.72 | -2% |
| Blks/60 | 1.80 | 1.83 | 1.87 | -2% |