Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2651 GP | H230 GP | H121 GP | Prev 3205 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.61 | 10.37 | 10.83 | 9.35 | 11.66 |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
| G | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| A | 7 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
| PTS | 17 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 81 | 80 | 99 | 54 | 87 |
| PIM | 21 | 13 | 6 | 24 | 29 |
| Hits | 109 | 101 | 91 | 116 | 123 |
| Blocks | 32 | 24 | 28 | 19 | 35 |
Sample: 51 GP · 464 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
SOG/60 finished the year 69% above where it started (4.33 in the first half, 7.31 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 46% below his 3-year rate last season (6.29 against 11.61).
We’re projecting assists 30% below last season, 10 to 7.
PIMs/60 finished the year 77% below where it started (1.43 in the first half, 0.33 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.61 | 10.37 | 11.66 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.49 | 9.11 | 10.03 | -9% |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | -3% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.40 | 6.20 | 5.28 | +17% |
| G/60 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.61 | -36% |
| iSH% | 8.31 | 6.29 | 11.61 | -46% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.73 | 0.65 | +13% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.23 | 9.92 | +13% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.10 | 6.28 | +13% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.36 | 3.30 | +2% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.74 | 8.36 | 6.66 | +26% |
| IPP | 47.55 | 44.96 | 56.15 | -20% |
| 1A/60 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.20 | +27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 0.14 | +260% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | -3% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 9.68 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.05 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.93 | -47% |
| Hits/60 | 7.97 | 7.88 | 8.73 | -10% |
| Blks/60 | 1.88 | 1.68 | 2.19 | -23% |