Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2656 GP | H222 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3132 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.83 | 10.83 | 10.43 | 10.84 | 12.26 |
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.52 |
| G | 9 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 11 |
| A | 12 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 14 |
| PTS | 21 | 22 | 33 | 14 | 25 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 86 | 76 | 89 | 70 | 115 |
| PIM | 21 | 40 | 15 | 52 | 18 |
| Hits | 88 | 108 | 117 | 102 | 90 |
| Blocks | 39 | 40 | 30 | 46 | 50 |
Sample: 56 GP · 536 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 15 pace in the second half after 9 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 72% above his 3-year rate last season (12.48 against 7.26).
Penalty minutes ran at a 15 pace in the second half after 52 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 ran 40% above his 3-year rate last season (8.05 against 5.77).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.83 | 10.83 | 12.26 | -12% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.56 | 9.58 | 11.11 | -14% |
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.52 | -65% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.38 | 5.37 | 6.79 | -21% |
| G/60 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.49 | +36% |
| iSH% | 9.45 | 12.48 | 7.26 | +72% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.57 | 0.78 | -27% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.62 | 12.64 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.14 | 6.71 | -23% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.12 | 3.28 | -35% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.91 | 10.13 | 7.44 | +36% |
| IPP | 64.17 | 61.09 | 70.15 | -13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.45 | +24% |
| 2A/60 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.41 | -17% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.52 | -65% |
| PP iSH% | 7.81 | 0.00 | 10.01 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.44 | 11.71 | 8.79 | +33% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.53 | 1.48 | -64% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.80 | 2.57 | 1.10 | +133% |
| Hits/60 | 6.78 | 8.05 | 5.77 | +40% |
| Blks/60 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 3.03 | -19% |