Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H238 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3104 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.51 | 21.55 | 20.36 | 20.39 | 19.82 |
| PP TOI | 2.45 | 2.31 | 2.56 | 2.08 | 2.26 |
| G | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| A | 20 | 25 | 21 | 30 | 16 |
| PTS | 29 | 34 | 29 | 38 | 24 |
| PPP | 10 | 9 | 15 | 4 | 7 |
| SOG | 109 | 106 | 119 | 93 | 93 |
| PIM | 32 | 35 | 24 | 45 | 24 |
| Hits | 20 | 17 | 11 | 23 | 35 |
| Blocks | 117 | 99 | 115 | 83 | 114 |
Sample: 78 GP · 1,397 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 64% below where it started (6.68 in the first half, 2.41 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 ran 60% below his 3-year rate last season (0.60 against 1.51).
Blks/60 finished the year 50% above where it started (2.86 in the first half, 4.29 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.51 | 21.55 | 19.82 | +9% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.69 | 17.92 | 16.46 | +9% |
| PP TOI | 2.45 | 2.31 | 2.26 | +2% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.26 | 3.26 | 2.91 | +12% |
| G/60 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.25 | -47% |
| iSH% | 6.24 | 3.99 | 8.50 | -53% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.18 | 0.13 | +42% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.81 | 8.10 | -4% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.40 | 1.79 | +34% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.39 | 0.14 | +185% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.20 | 9.73 | 8.11 | +20% |
| IPP | 32.07 | 32.63 | 30.37 | +7% |
| 1A/60 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.25 | -47% |
| 2A/60 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.17 | +202% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.45 | 2.31 | 2.26 | +2% |
| PP iSH% | 8.65 | 5.51 | 11.12 | -50% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.48 | 5.99 | 6.88 | -13% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.69 | 0.45 | +52% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.84 | -3% |
| Hits/60 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 1.51 | -60% |
| Blks/60 | 4.09 | 3.52 | 4.66 | -25% |