Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2680 GP | H240 GP | H140 GP | Prev 396 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.76 | 20.17 | 19.67 | 19.78 | 17.90 |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| G | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| A | 19 | 28 | 28 | 26 | 12 |
| PTS | 21 | 31 | 31 | 29 | 13 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 72 | 72 | 70 | 74 | 65 |
| PIM | 40 | 56 | 55 | 57 | 35 |
| Hits | 159 | 166 | 170 | 162 | 135 |
| Blocks | 118 | 115 | 120 | 110 | 114 |
Sample: 80 GP · 1,385 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting assists 32% below last season, 28 to 19.
We’re projecting points 32% below last season, 31 to 21.
ixG/60 sits in the 2th percentile league-wide (0.09).
SOG/60 sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (2.56).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.76 | 20.17 | 17.90 | +13% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.12 | 17.32 | 15.73 | +10% |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.15 | -68% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.94 | -13% |
| G/60 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.04 | +119% |
| iSH% | 2.46 | 3.52 | 1.40 | +152% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.09 | 0.07 | +21% |
| iCF/60 | – | 6.32 | 7.07 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.47 | 1.63 | -10% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.04 | 0.08 | -51% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.07 | 10.91 | 8.36 | +31% |
| IPP | 33.01 | 35.64 | 27.66 | +29% |
| 1A/60 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.24 | +79% |
| 2A/60 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.32 | +76% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.15 | -68% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 13.87 | 15.45 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.51 | 0.99 | -48% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.45 | 1.52 | 1.35 | +13% |
| Hits/60 | 5.76 | 5.89 | 5.56 | +6% |
| Blks/60 | 3.95 | 3.77 | 4.21 | -10% |