Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2674 GP | H236 GP | H138 GP | Prev 3206 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.61 | 14.46 | 13.93 | 14.35 | 15.64 |
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.97 | 1.53 |
| G | 12 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 17 |
| A | 19 | 19 | 16 | 22 | 24 |
| PTS | 31 | 28 | 25 | 30 | 41 |
| PPP | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| SOG | 91 | 84 | 83 | 85 | 127 |
| PIM | 38 | 25 | 39 | 13 | 38 |
| Hits | 76 | 79 | 66 | 91 | 92 |
| Blocks | 48 | 44 | 54 | 35 | 47 |
Sample: 74 GP · 873 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): 3rd-line C on COL with no power-play role - PP TOI trimmed to spot duty (1.13 -> 0.3) to match the depth chart.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting PP TOI 65% below last season, 0.86 to 0.30.
PIMs/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (0.81 in the first half, 2.87 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Blocks ran at a 54 pace in the second half after 35 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting goals 33% above last season, 9 to 12.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.61 | 14.46 | 15.64 | -8% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.77 | 11.80 | 12.46 | -5% |
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.86 | 1.53 | -44% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.74 | 3.71 | 5.40 | -31% |
| G/60 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.72 | -43% |
| iSH% | 12.42 | 11.05 | 13.41 | -18% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.55 | 0.71 | -22% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.93 | 10.30 | -13% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.46 | 7.08 | -9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.16 | 3.83 | -18% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.30 | 10.19 | 8.30 | +23% |
| IPP | 60.33 | 54.36 | 74.28 | -27% |
| 1A/60 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.51 | +21% |
| 2A/60 | 0.40 | 0.27 | 0.44 | -39% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.86 | 1.53 | -44% |
| PP iSH% | 9.85 | 10.51 | 9.38 | +12% |
| PP SOG/60 | 15.81 | 17.99 | 12.15 | +48% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 4.40 | 2.53 | +74% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.13 | 1.58 | 1.66 | -5% |
| Hits/60 | 4.69 | 4.81 | 5.16 | -7% |
| Blks/60 | 2.31 | 2.06 | 2.36 | -13% |