Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2668 GP | H234 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3218 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.37 | 15.36 | 14.99 | 14.38 | 15.46 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| G | 11 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 8 |
| A | 18 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 23 |
| PTS | 29 | 29 | 33 | 25 | 31 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 86 | 90 | 98 | 83 | 81 |
| PIM | 30 | 46 | 51 | 41 | 23 |
| Hits | 99 | 107 | 107 | 107 | 89 |
| Blocks | 61 | 60 | 57 | 64 | 62 |
Sample: 68 GP · 799 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 18 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.
iHDCF/60 finished the year 116% above where it started (1.74 in the first half, 3.75 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 58% above his 3-year rate last season (11.11 against 7.05).
1A/60 ran 46% below his 3-year rate last season (0.38 against 0.70).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.37 | 15.36 | 15.46 | -1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.95 | 11.76 | 11.84 | -1% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | -61% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.05 | 4.05 | 3.95 | +3% |
| G/60 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.28 | +61% |
| iSH% | 9.57 | 11.11 | 7.05 | +58% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.69 | 0.51 | +36% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.08 | 8.97 | +1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.48 | 5.60 | -2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.78 | 2.46 | +13% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.05 | 8.05 | 8.05 | -0% |
| IPP | 69.01 | 71.11 | 65.75 | +8% |
| 1A/60 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.70 | -46% |
| 2A/60 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.32 | +39% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | -61% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 50.01 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 5.42 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.03 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.31 | 2.40 | 1.20 | +99% |
| Hits/60 | 6.01 | 6.60 | 5.13 | +29% |
| Blks/60 | 2.56 | 2.63 | 2.53 | +4% |