Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2665 GP | H232 GP | H133 GP | Prev 3194 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.82 | 13.52 | 13.20 | 13.19 | 15.60 |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.16 |
| G | 9 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 12 |
| A | 13 | 10 | 4 | 16 | 19 |
| PTS | 22 | 18 | 8 | 28 | 31 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 101 | 79 | 70 | 88 | 127 |
| PIM | 41 | 55 | 64 | 47 | 24 |
| Hits | 116 | 112 | 119 | 106 | 97 |
| Blocks | 32 | 37 | 37 | 36 | 33 |
Sample: 65 GP · 771 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 4 pace in the second half after 16 in the first, per 82 games.
Points ran at a 8 pace in the second half after 28 in the first, per 82 games.
PIMs/60 ran 132% above his 3-year rate last season (2.64 against 1.14).
Hits/60 ran 36% above his 3-year rate last season (6.69 against 4.92).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.82 | 13.52 | 15.60 | -13% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.04 | 11.87 | 13.59 | -13% |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.16 | -47% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.51 | 4.51 | 6.17 | -27% |
| G/60 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.48 | -18% |
| iSH% | 8.13 | 8.65 | 7.76 | +11% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.44 | 0.57 | -23% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.32 | 11.22 | -26% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.59 | 5.51 | -17% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.18 | 2.48 | -12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.19 | 7.06 | 7.36 | -4% |
| IPP | 58.56 | 57.06 | 60.39 | -6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.46 | -14% |
| 2A/60 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.39 | -59% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.16 | -47% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 50.02 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 11.77 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.60 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.11 | 2.64 | 1.14 | +132% |
| Hits/60 | 6.98 | 6.69 | 4.92 | +36% |
| Blks/60 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.25 | +25% |