Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2677 GP | H239 GP | H138 GP | Prev 3243 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.72 | 14.84 | 14.77 | 14.17 | 15.19 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| G | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
| A | 18 | 18 | 21 | 15 | 20 |
| PTS | 30 | 31 | 34 | 28 | 34 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 118 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 142 |
| PIM | 31 | 37 | 38 | 37 | 39 |
| Hits | 95 | 119 | 106 | 133 | 76 |
| Blocks | 48 | 53 | 51 | 56 | 38 |
Sample: 77 GP · 945 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits/60 ran 68% above his 3-year rate last season (6.79 against 4.05).
Assists ran at a 21 pace in the second half after 15 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 40% above where it started (0.41 in the first half, 0.57 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 ran 21% below his 3-year rate last season (5.90 against 7.46).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.72 | 14.84 | 15.19 | -2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.28 | 12.28 | 12.94 | -5% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | -64% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.72 | 5.90 | 7.46 | -21% |
| G/60 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.67 | -24% |
| iSH% | 8.83 | 8.64 | 8.96 | -4% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.79 | 0.91 | -13% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.03 | 15.18 | -8% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.12 | 8.63 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.00 | 4.64 | -14% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.59 | 9.41 | 8.04 | +17% |
| IPP | 57.72 | 52.33 | 66.51 | -21% |
| 1A/60 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.67 | -24% |
| 2A/60 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.34 | +28% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | -64% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 4.82 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.97 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.85 | 2.09 | 2.12 | -1% |
| Hits/60 | 5.38 | 6.79 | 4.05 | +68% |
| Blks/60 | 1.98 | 2.16 | 1.76 | +23% |