🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Isaak Phillips

WPG · Age 24.8 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′3″, 205 lb · Draft 2020, 141st overall (CHI)
WPGteam
Dposition
171position rank
484skater rank
-18overall
-57offense
40peripherals
goals
0
assists
15
points
15
power play points
0
shots on goal
77
penalty minutes
55
hits
139
blocked shots
90

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-26thinH23 GPH125-26Prev 333 GP · 1y
TOI17.07–––17.07
PP TOI0.08–––0.08
G0–––0
A15–––15
PTS15–––15
PPP0–––0
SOG77–––77
PIM55–––55
Hits139–––139
Blocks90–––89

Sample: 3 GP · 28 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
168Jared Spurgeon-16
169Tom Willander-17
170Tristan Luneau-18
171Isaak Phillips-18
172Dylan DeMelo-18
173Alec Regula-18
174Mason Lohrei-18
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Isaak Phillips is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Scott Arniel (WPG)
Last year: Scott Arniel full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj		2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI17.07n/a17.07
5v5 TOI15.23n/a15.23
PP TOI0.08n/a0.08
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 0 · 3 · 0
By season — year over year
TOI
17.0722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
15.2322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj		2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/603.10n/a3.10
G/600.00n/a0.00
iSH%0.00n/a0.00
ixG/60–n/a0.17
iCF/60–n/a9.19
iSCF/60–n/a2.15
iHDCF/60–n/a0.48
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 0 · 3 · 0
SOG/60
3-yr 3.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.17Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 9.19Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 2.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.48Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
3.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.1722-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
9.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.4822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
7722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextNo 2025-26 sample — goals/shots projected off the prior 3-yr profile, held flat.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj		2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%5.66n/a5.66
IPP54.96n/a54.96
1A/600.36n/a0.36
2A/600.36n/a0.36
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 0 · 3 · 0
1A/60
3-yr 0.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3622-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 5.7%, IPP 55.0%).
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj		2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.08n/a0.08
PP iSH%–n/an/a
PP SOG/600.00n/a0.00
PP ixG/60–n/a0.00
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 0 · 3 · 0
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.08Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextLittle/no PP role — PP points capped regardless of finishing.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj		2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.43n/a1.43
Hits/606.68n/a6.68
Blks/603.46n/a3.46
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 0 · 3 · 0
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 6.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.46Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.4322-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
6.6822-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.4622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
5522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
13922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
9022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 6.68/60 (73rd pct league-wide) → 6.68 projected.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 3.46/60 (70th pct league-wide) → 3.46 projected.