Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H242 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3239 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.36 | 21.46 | 20.93 | 20.54 | 20.98 |
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| G | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| A | 18 | 16 | 7 | 26 | 22 |
| PTS | 22 | 19 | 9 | 30 | 26 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 78 | 74 | 89 | 58 | 86 |
| PIM | 32 | 40 | 17 | 63 | 42 |
| Hits | 120 | 115 | 102 | 129 | 146 |
| Blocks | 107 | 109 | 100 | 118 | 117 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,504 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 7 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 78% below where it started (7.64 in the first half, 1.69 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 58% below his 3-year rate last season (0.16 against 0.38).
5v5 TOI sits in the 96th percentile league-wide (18.34).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.36 | 21.46 | 20.98 | +2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.20 | 18.34 | 17.91 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.09 | +34% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.72 | 2.75 | 3.31 | -17% |
| G/60 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.13 | -7% |
| iSH% | 4.03 | 4.36 | 3.89 | +12% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.12 | 0.14 | -14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.78 | 7.81 | -0% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.48 | 1.76 | -16% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.24 | 0.27 | -10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.76 | 9.66 | 9.89 | -2% |
| IPP | 28.84 | 25.50 | 34.30 | -26% |
| 1A/60 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.38 | -58% |
| 2A/60 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.48 | -24% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.09 | +34% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.19 | 1.52 | 1.66 | -8% |
| Hits/60 | 4.41 | 4.19 | 5.63 | -26% |
| Blks/60 | 3.47 | 3.55 | 3.50 | +1% |