Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2667 GP | H233 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3153 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.96 | 21.62 | 20.00 | 20.66 | 23.23 |
| PP TOI | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.03 | 1.81 | 1.95 |
| G | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| A | ▼23 | 26 | 27 | 24 | 35 |
| PTS | ▼29 | 32 | 33 | 32 | 42 |
| PPP | 7 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| SOG | 121 | 122 | 104 | 140 | 138 |
| PIM | 62 | 71 | 67 | 75 | 64 |
| Hits | 23 | 15 | 21 | 9 | 68 |
| Blocks | ▲126 | 126 | 116 | 136 | 100 |
Sample: 67 GP · 1,085 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Points trimmed and blocks raised — two independent corrections in opposite directions. The engine had him 6 points above both outside reads on offence while understating the blocks that are his actual fantasy value.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 101% above where it started (3.36 in the first half, 6.76 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP TOI finished the year 41% below where it started (1.80 in the first half, 1.05 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 ran 52% above his 3-year rate last season (11.33 against 7.44).
Blks/60 ran 38% above his 3-year rate last season (4.26 against 3.08).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.96 | 21.62 | 23.23 | -7% |
| 5v5 TOI | 16.52 | 16.19 | 17.55 | -8% |
| PP TOI | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.95 | -27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.76 | 3.98 | 4.29 | -7% |
| G/60 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.16 | +39% |
| iSH% | 4.24 | 5.53 | 3.68 | +50% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.17 | 0.21 | -18% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.12 | 9.25 | +9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.99 | 3.22 | -7% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.39 | 0.69 | -44% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.77 | 9.96 | 9.21 | +8% |
| IPP | 39.66 | 42.69 | 34.01 | +26% |
| 1A/60 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.38 | +32% |
| 2A/60 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.44 | -12% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.95 | -27% |
| PP iSH% | 5.48 | 5.56 | 5.42 | +3% |
| PP SOG/60 | 10.36 | 11.33 | 7.44 | +52% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.89 | 0.50 | +76% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.81 | 2.10 | 1.68 | +25% |
| Hits/60 | 0.68 | 0.50 | 2.37 | -79% |
| Blks/60 | 3.77 | 4.26 | 3.08 | +38% |