Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-26thin | H26 GP | H16 GP | Prev 3130 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.81 | – | 13.52 | 14.16 | 14.81 |
| PP TOI | 1.44 | – | 1.32 | 1.12 | 1.44 |
| G | 21 | – | – | – | 22 |
| A | 21 | – | – | – | 23 |
| PTS | 42 | – | – | – | 45 |
| PPP | 6 | – | – | – | 6 |
| SOG | 185 | – | – | – | 195 |
| PIM | 22 | – | – | – | 30 |
| Hits | 27 | – | – | – | 35 |
| Blocks | 21 | – | – | – | 31 |
Sample: 12 GP · 151 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 finished the year 58% below where it started (1.64 in the first half, 0.69 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 finished the year 54% below where it started (10.74 in the first half, 4.92 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.81 | n/a | 14.81 | |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.69 | n/a | 12.69 | |
| PP TOI | 1.44 | n/a | 1.44 |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.98 | n/a | 9.85 | |
| G/60 | 0.82 | n/a | 1.02 | |
| iSH% | 10.31 | n/a | 10.31 | |
| ixG/60 | – | n/a | 1.00 | |
| iCF/60 | – | n/a | 18.04 | |
| iSCF/60 | – | n/a | 10.62 | |
| iHDCF/60 | – | n/a | 4.51 |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.27 | n/a | 9.27 | |
| IPP | 69.81 | n/a | 69.81 | |
| 1A/60 | 0.49 | n/a | 0.58 | |
| 2A/60 | 0.33 | n/a | 0.33 |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.44 | n/a | 1.44 | |
| PP iSH% | 13.79 | n/a | 13.79 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.75 | n/a | 9.27 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | n/a | 1.52 |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.96 | n/a | 1.60 | |
| Hits/60 | 1.49 | n/a | 1.93 | |
| Blks/60 | 0.92 | n/a | 1.53 |