🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Drew O'Connor

VAN · Age 28.1 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 200 lb · Undrafted
VANteam
LW,RWposition
160position rank
480skater rank
-17overall
-36offense
20peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2682 GPH241 GPH141 GPPrev 3209 GP · 3y
TOI14.4714.5915.3213.0113.92
PP TOI0.480.400.580.210.15
G1417161812
A1512111315
PTS2929273127
PPP10001
SOG144136170102133
PIM3447583626
Hits8277876778
Blocks4326203251

Sample: 82 GP · 1,043 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
We project it up
BLK
4322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting blocks 65% above last season, 26 to 43.

Second-half surge
SOG
14422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Shots ran at a 170 pace in the second half after 102 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
iSH%
3-yr 7.845.82Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 52% below where it started (17.42 in the first half, 8.30 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Above his 3-year rate
PIMs/60
2.7022-2323-2424-2525-26

PIMs/60 ran 84% above his 3-year rate last season (2.70 against 1.47).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Drew O'Connor is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 3
    fills: SOG, PPP, A
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Patrick KaneRW · Chicago Blackhawkscovers 3
    fills: PPP, A, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Manny Malhotra (VAN) new voice
Last year: Adam Foote full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI14.4714.5913.92+5%
5v5 TOI13.0312.7312.12+5%
PP TOI0.480.400.15+173%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 13.9216.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 12.1214.20Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.150.98Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
14.4722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
13.0322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.4822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/606.666.327.28-13%
G/600.630.750.57+32%
iSH%9.5311.877.84+51%
ixG/600.950.99-4%
iCF/6012.7613.84-8%
iSCF/607.598.79-14%
iHDCF/604.944.93+0%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 7.287.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 7.845.82Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.991.12Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 13.8413.12Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 8.798.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.935.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
6.3222-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
11.8722-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.9522-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.7622-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
7.5922-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
4.9422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
14422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 11.9% vs a 7.8% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.95 (91st pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 9.5% pulls the goal rate ~15% down.
RiskShot volume down 13% (5v5 SOG/60 6.32 vs 7.28) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.79→1.08 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.268.937.60+18%
IPP64.6066.6761.23+9%
1A/600.480.520.45+15%
2A/600.270.110.36-69%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.450.44Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.360.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.5222-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.1122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.9%, IPP 66.7%).

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.480.400.15+173%
PP iSH%11.140.0014.28-100%
PP SOG/607.897.4013.86-47%
PP ixG/602.484.52-45%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.150.98Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 13.866.46Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 4.521.75Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.4022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
7.4022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.4822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.4→0.5 PP TOI/gp (new coach (Manny Malhotra) — late-year 0.8 role discounted until the new staff sets usage) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/602.282.701.47+84%
Hits/604.354.204.57-8%
Blks/601.471.382.20-37%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.472.89Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 4.574.67Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.201.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
2.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
4.2022-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
1.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
3422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
8222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
4322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 4.20/60 (51st pct league-wide) → 4.35 projected.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.11/60 and 2nd-half 0.97 below the 1.38 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.47/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.20 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.06/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.