Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2679 GP | H239 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3223 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.44 | 15.59 | 16.35 | 14.24 | 14.83 |
| PP TOI | 1.03 | 1.21 | 0.70 | 1.70 | 1.57 |
| G | 13 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 15 |
| A | 18 | 17 | 20 | 13 | 20 |
| PTS | 31 | 30 | 33 | 27 | 35 |
| PPP | 4 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 8 |
| SOG | 121 | 117 | 123 | 112 | 133 |
| PIM | 16 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 15 |
| Hits | 94 | 125 | 130 | 119 | 45 |
| Blocks | 66 | 58 | 58 | 59 | 66 |
Sample: 79 GP · 1,022 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits/60 ran 146% above his 3-year rate last season (6.98 against 2.84).
Power play points ran at a 2 pace in the second half after 8 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI finished the year 62% below where it started (1.75 in the first half, 0.66 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 56% below his 3-year rate last season (0.23 against 0.53).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.44 | 15.59 | 14.83 | +5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.46 | 12.94 | 11.28 | +15% |
| PP TOI | 1.03 | 1.21 | 1.57 | -23% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.08 | 5.11 | 6.37 | -20% |
| G/60 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.55 | +8% |
| iSH% | 10.43 | 11.55 | 8.62 | +34% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.71 | 0.69 | +2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.51 | 11.80 | -19% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.28 | 6.84 | -8% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.58 | 3.91 | -9% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.39 | 10.45 | 8.68 | +20% |
| IPP | 52.40 | 48.55 | 57.11 | -15% |
| 1A/60 | 0.35 | 0.23 | 0.53 | -56% |
| 2A/60 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.36 | -2% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.03 | 1.21 | 1.57 | -23% |
| PP iSH% | 16.80 | 9.56 | 22.04 | -57% |
| PP SOG/60 | 8.41 | 13.18 | 11.64 | +13% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.14 | 2.02 | +56% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.84 | -29% |
| Hits/60 | 5.06 | 6.98 | 2.84 | +146% |
| Blks/60 | 3.17 | 2.99 | 3.45 | -13% |