Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2660 GP | H220 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3233 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.69 | 13.78 | 13.17 | 13.57 | 14.07 |
| PP TOI | 1.34 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.25 |
| G | 10 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 10 |
| A | 19 | 8 | 19 | 4 | 25 |
| PTS | 29 | 19 | 27 | 17 | 35 |
| PPP | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| SOG | 97 | 105 | 101 | 106 | 105 |
| PIM | 37 | 38 | 34 | 42 | 39 |
| Hits | 97 | 104 | 99 | 103 | 100 |
| Blocks | 48 | 51 | 52 | 51 | 47 |
Sample: 60 GP · 672 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP ixG/60 finished the year 86% below where it started (2.16 in the first half, 0.30 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 finished the year 75% below where it started (11.12 in the first half, 2.83 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
2A/60 ran 71% below his 3-year rate last season (0.18 against 0.62).
1A/60 ran 23% below his 3-year rate last season (0.36 against 0.47).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.69 | 13.78 | 14.07 | -2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.15 | 11.20 | 11.57 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 1.34 | 1.47 | 1.25 | +18% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.82 | 4.91 | 5.52 | -11% |
| G/60 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.44 | -19% |
| iSH% | 7.75 | 7.33 | 8.05 | -9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.60 | 0.76 | -21% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.09 | 9.88 | +2% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.43 | 6.85 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.48 | 3.87 | -10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 6.93 | 5.76 | 8.83 | -35% |
| IPP | 60.76 | 62.24 | 58.95 | +6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.47 | -23% |
| 2A/60 | 0.45 | 0.18 | 0.62 | -71% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.34 | 1.47 | 1.25 | +18% |
| PP iSH% | 16.45 | 13.32 | 18.72 | -29% |
| PP SOG/60 | 6.83 | 10.21 | 6.61 | +55% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.73 | 1.33 | +30% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.03 | 2.14 | 2.22 | -4% |
| Hits/60 | 5.92 | 6.34 | 6.08 | +4% |
| Blks/60 | 2.66 | 2.77 | 2.50 | +11% |