Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2677 GP | H236 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3196 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.35 | 12.35 | 11.46 | 12.61 | 13.94 |
| PP TOI | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.26 | 1.48 | 1.60 |
| G | 11 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 19 |
| A | 14 | 17 | 11 | 22 | 16 |
| PTS | 25 | 24 | 23 | 26 | 35 |
| PPP | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| SOG | 124 | 127 | 121 | 132 | 165 |
| PIM | 50 | 42 | 48 | 36 | 62 |
| Hits | 87 | 104 | 118 | 92 | 72 |
| Blocks | 26 | 21 | 30 | 14 | 36 |
Sample: 77 GP · 822 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP ixG/60 finished the year 79% below where it started (2.25 in the first half, 0.47 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 finished the year 78% below where it started (10.01 in the first half, 2.16 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 ran 65% above his 3-year rate last season (7.15 against 4.32).
iSH% ran 54% below his 3-year rate last season (4.62 against 10.02).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.35 | 12.35 | 13.94 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.51 | 10.69 | 12.03 | -11% |
| PP TOI | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.60 | -14% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.57 | 7.80 | 8.88 | -12% |
| G/60 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.89 | -60% |
| iSH% | 7.75 | 4.62 | 10.02 | -54% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.01 | 1.09 | -8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.39 | 17.12 | -10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.88 | 10.08 | -22% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.67 | 5.06 | -8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.03 | 9.57 | 8.36 | +14% |
| IPP | 58.20 | 49.81 | 71.90 | -31% |
| 1A/60 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.56 | -48% |
| 2A/60 | 0.41 | 0.66 | 0.23 | +192% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.60 | -14% |
| PP iSH% | 15.98 | 16.62 | 15.80 | +5% |
| PP SOG/60 | 5.60 | 6.80 | 7.29 | -7% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.50 | 1.71 | -12% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.24 | 2.70 | 3.51 | -23% |
| Hits/60 | 6.10 | 7.15 | 4.32 | +65% |
| Blks/60 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 2.08 | -30% |