Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2679 GP | H241 GP | H138 GP | Prev 323 GP · 1y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.23 | 12.51 | 13.80 | 10.39 | 10.93 |
| PP TOI | 1.18 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 1.34 | 0.86 |
| G | 13 | 16 | 10 | 22 | 11 |
| A | 16 | 21 | 24 | 17 | 11 |
| PTS | 29 | 36 | 34 | 39 | 22 |
| PPP | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| SOG | 118 | 120 | 122 | 119 | 100 |
| PIM | 30 | 44 | 36 | 52 | 21 |
| Hits | 79 | 86 | 58 | 117 | 96 |
| Blocks | 32 | 23 | 29 | 16 | 29 |
Sample: 79 GP · 851 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 57% above his 3-year rate last season (1.36 against 0.86).
Goals ran at a 10 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 finished the year 63% below where it started (9.40 in the first half, 3.46 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 65% above his 3-year rate last season (14.20 against 8.62).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.23 | 12.51 | 10.93 | +14% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.45 | 10.78 | 9.94 | +8% |
| PP TOI | 1.18 | 1.36 | 0.86 | +57% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.39 | 6.48 | 6.03 | +7% |
| G/60 | 0.70 | 0.92 | 0.52 | +77% |
| iSH% | 10.96 | 14.20 | 8.62 | +65% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.08 | 1.17 | -8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.05 | 12.86 | -6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.10 | 8.92 | -9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.93 | 6.03 | -18% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.70 | 10.24 | 11.35 | -10% |
| IPP | 57.07 | 78.16 | 40.08 | +95% |
| 1A/60 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.52 | +8% |
| 2A/60 | 0.20 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.18 | 1.36 | 0.86 | +57% |
| PP iSH% | 17.60 | 9.08 | 20.00 | -55% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.88 | 12.33 | 15.15 | -19% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.66 | 4.62 | -42% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.06 | 2.39 | 1.57 | +52% |
| Hits/60 | 5.08 | 5.85 | 7.08 | -17% |
| Blks/60 | 1.68 | 1.41 | 2.10 | -33% |