Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2645 GP | H229 GP | H116 GP | Prev 385 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.50 | 10.01 | 10.04 | 9.65 | 11.81 |
| PP TOI | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| G | 9 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 9 |
| A | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| PTS | 16 | 15 | 11 | 18 | 19 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 65 | 78 | 82 | 65 | 66 |
| PIM | 29 | 35 | 48 | 12 | 27 |
| Hits | 219 | 259 | 252 | 258 | 220 |
| Blocks | 40 | 36 | 34 | 41 | 46 |
Sample: 45 GP · 443 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 ran 89% above his 3-year rate last season (0.85 against 0.45).
PIMs/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (0.89 in the first half, 3.54 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iHDCF/60 ran 99% above his 3-year rate last season (4.60 against 2.32).
1A/60 sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (0.00).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.50 | 10.01 | 11.81 | -15% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.05 | 9.86 | 10.36 | -5% |
| PP TOI | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | +12% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.81 | 5.81 | 4.16 | +40% |
| G/60 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.47 | +71% |
| iSH% | 12.96 | 13.94 | 11.37 | +23% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.85 | 0.45 | +89% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.76 | 9.06 | +30% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.71 | 5.39 | +43% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.60 | 2.32 | +99% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.69 | 10.21 | 8.31 | +23% |
| IPP | 58.05 | 57.14 | 61.63 | -7% |
| 1A/60 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.34 | -100% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.27 | -0% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | +12% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 5.47 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.50 | 2.57 | 1.77 | +45% |
| Hits/60 | 17.52 | 19.06 | 15.20 | +25% |
| Blks/60 | 2.76 | 2.70 | 2.86 | -6% |