Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2665 GP | H223 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3225 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.31 | 13.24 | 11.67 | 13.78 | 16.42 |
| PP TOI | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.82 | 1.71 |
| G | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 21 |
| A | 15 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 21 |
| PTS | 25 | 19 | 18 | 20 | 42 |
| PPP | 3 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| SOG | 107 | 115 | 96 | 125 | 137 |
| PIM | 27 | 23 | 29 | 19 | 27 |
| Hits | 45 | 43 | 37 | 46 | 67 |
| Blocks | 73 | 95 | 72 | 107 | 74 |
Sample: 65 GP · 699 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 64% below his 3-year rate last season (0.62 against 1.71).
iSH% ran 81% below his 3-year rate last season (2.64 against 14.21).
Blocks ran at a 72 pace in the second half after 107 in the first, per 82 games.
Shots ran at a 96 pace in the second half after 125 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.31 | 13.24 | 16.42 | -19% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.56 | 10.76 | 12.10 | -11% |
| PP TOI | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.71 | -64% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.24 | 6.43 | 6.04 | +6% |
| G/60 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.86 | -80% |
| iSH% | 7.04 | 2.64 | 14.21 | -81% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.78 | 0.72 | +8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.92 | 10.98 | +9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.95 | 6.63 | +5% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.60 | 3.73 | -3% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 6.62 | 6.05 | 9.36 | -35% |
| IPP | 57.87 | 56.20 | 64.43 | -13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.37 | +61% |
| 2A/60 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.37 | -100% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.71 | -64% |
| PP iSH% | 10.11 | 0.00 | 17.44 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.45 | 11.99 | 9.82 | +22% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.78 | 1.96 | +42% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.28 | 1.03 | 1.28 | -19% |
| Hits/60 | 2.95 | 2.83 | 3.73 | -24% |
| Blks/60 | 4.64 | 5.66 | 3.15 | +80% |