Per 82 GP	2026-27projection adj	2025-2630 GP	H214 GP	H116 GP	Prev 3thin
TOI	8.63	8.51	8.08	8.20	–
PP TOI	1.87	1.93	1.63	2.08	–
G	11	11	27	0	–
A	▲20	19	7	27	–
PTS	▲31	30	34	27	–
PPP	▲8	8	0	11	–
SOG	▼96	93	102	82	–
PIM	▲8	5	14	0	–
Hits	▼68	82	61	104	–
Blocks	▲25	22	14	27	–

Sample: 30 GP · 192 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)

235Alexander Kerfoot-40

236Nils Hoglander-41

237Berkly Catton-41

238Stephen Halliday-41

239Joshua Roy-41

240Isak Rosen-43

241Samuel Honzek-43

offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Rookie baseline: projected role (3rd-line C + PP + secondary O; one day could become someone like Couturier) blended with 2025-26 NHL (30 GP) at w=0.50. Per-82 line; GP/availability is separate. Tune here.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

Second-half surge

ixG/60

ixG/60 finished the year 89% above where it started (0.56 in the first half, 1.06 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge

PP ixG/60

PP ixG/60 finished the year 108% above where it started (1.01 in the first half, 2.10 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Bottom of the league

TOI

TOI sits in the 1th percentile league-wide (8.51).

Top of the league

SOG/60

SOG/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (8.71).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Jack QuinnRW · Buffalo Sabres81% match
Pavel ZachaC,LW · Boston Bruins79% match
Cole PerfettiLW,RW · Winnipeg Jets78% match
Mackie SamoskevichLW,RW · Seattle Kraken78% match
shared: Hits

Complementary Forward

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Stephen Halliday is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Evgeni MalkinC,LW · Pittsburgh Penguinscovers 3
fills: A, PIM, SOG
Matvei MichkovLW,RW · Philadelphia Flyerscovers 3
fills: PIM, A, SOG
Connor BedardC · Chicago Blackhawkscovers 3
fills: A, SOG, PIM
Brandon HagelLW · Tampa Bay Lightningcovers 3
fills: SOG, A, PIM

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · Travis Green (OTT)

Last year: Travis Green full season — no change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3
TOI	8.63	8.51	n/a
5v5 TOI	6.52	6.43	n/a
PP TOI	1.87	1.93	n/a

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 1 · 15 · 12 · 2

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 8.63: one NHL season — role grown +1% toward a sophomore workload
5v5 TOI → 6.52: one NHL season — role grown +1% toward a sophomore workload
PP TOI → 1.87: role tapered late (Q4 1.6 vs 1.9 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3
SOG/60	8.71	8.71	n/a
G/60	1.24	1.24	n/a
iSH%	14.24	14.24	n/a
ixG/60	–	0.78	n/a
iCF/60	–	14.31	n/a
iSCF/60	–	9.64	n/a
iHDCF/60	–	5.29	n/a

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 1 · 15 · 12 · 2

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.56→1.06 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.

TailwindAge 24 on a single NHL season — projected a development step, not a flat repeat: scoring rates +2% and role +1% toward the mid-20s peak (a young riser improves on last year, not repeats it).

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3
on-ice SH%	8.66	8.66	n/a
IPP	88.93	88.93	n/a
1A/60	0.62	0.62	n/a
2A/60	0.62	0.62	n/a

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 1 · 15 · 12 · 2

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindProject Halliday for a 2026-27 OTT bottom-six-plus role with assist/secondary-PP value.

ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.7%, IPP 88.9%).

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3
PP TOI	1.87	1.93	n/a
PP iSH%	0.00	0.00	n/a
PP SOG/60	6.84	6.21	n/a
PP ixG/60	–	1.43	n/a

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 1 · 15 · 12 · 2

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindProject Halliday for a 2026-27 OTT bottom-six-plus role with assist/secondary-PP value.

ContextPP role steady at ~1.9 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3
PIMs/60	0.82	0.62	n/a
Hits/60	8.96	9.33	n/a
Blks/60	2.29	2.49	n/a

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 1 · 15 · 12 · 2

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskHits tailing off: Q4 7.01/60 and 2nd-half 7.01 below the 9.33 season rate — projected DOWN to 8.96/60, weighting the recent decline over the n/a 3-yr mark.

RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.56/60 and 2nd-half 1.56 below the 2.49 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.29/60, weighting the recent decline over the n/a 3-yr mark.