🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Alexander Kerfoot

NSH · Age 32.0 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 5′11″, 186 lb · Draft 2012, 150th overall (N.J)
NSHteam
C,LW,RWposition
195position rank
686skater rank
-40overall
-40offense
0peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2634 GPH228 GPH16 GPPrev 3163 GP · 2y
TOI13.4212.7912.7510.8314.93
PP TOI0.440.390.440.170.50
G1017171611
A171517220
PTS2731341930
PPP10002
SOG946751144118
PIM2655536422
Hits5672794357
Blocks5365656454

Sample: 34 GP · 357 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
iSH%
3-yr 7.5233.23Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 150% above where it started (11.08 in the first half, 33.37 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
HITS
5622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Hits ran at a 79 pace in the second half after 43 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
PIMs/60
3.1922-2323-2424-2525-26

PIMs/60 ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (3.19 against 1.24).

We project it down
G
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting goals 41% below last season, 17 to 10.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Alexander Kerfoot is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 3
    fills: SOG, PPP, A
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Patrick KaneRW · Chicago Blackhawkscovers 3
    fills: PPP, A, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Andrew Brunette (NSH)
Last year (UTA, traded): André Tourigny full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI13.4212.7914.93-14%
5v5 TOI10.9710.5011.90-12%
PP TOI0.440.390.50-21%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 6 · 9 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 14.9313.35Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 11.9011.23Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.500.60Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
13.4222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
10.9722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.4422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/603.594.036.18-35%
G/600.731.010.46+117%
iSH%14.8925.067.52+233%
ixG/600.380.74-49%
iCF/609.4110.70-12%
iSCF/604.876.62-26%
iHDCF/601.853.56-48%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 6 · 9 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 6.183.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 7.5233.23Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.740.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 10.709.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 6.624.78Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.561.69Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.0322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
25.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
9.4122-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
4.8722-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
1.8522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
9422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 25.1% vs a 7.5% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.38 (35th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 14.9% pulls the goal rate ~28% down.
RiskShot volume down 35% (5v5 SOG/60 4.03 vs 6.18) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.66 (1st half) to 0.31 (2nd).
RiskAge 32 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.2511.857.51+58%
IPP71.1278.7266.04+19%
1A/600.550.500.62-19%
2A/600.310.340.37-8%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 6 · 9 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.620.84Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.370.28Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.5022-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskAssists projected DOWN: on-ice SH% 11.9% (3-yr 7.5%) AND IPP 78.7% (3-yr 66.0%) both ran hot — team finishing + participation luck stacked. Regressing both trims the assist rate ~16%.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.440.390.50-21%
PP iSH%12.870.0022.19-100%
PP SOG/604.174.476.59-32%
PP ixG/601.090.86+27%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 6 · 9 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.500.60Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 6.590.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.860.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.3922-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
4.4722-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
1.0922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.4→0.4 PP TOI/gp (same coach (Andrew Brunette) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 0.4, Q4 0.6) over the full-year 0.4) — the biggest PPP lever.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (0.0% vs 22.2%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/602.133.191.24+158%
Hits/603.914.873.22+51%
Blks/603.253.862.53+52%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  0 · 6 · 9 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.240.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 3.225.62Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.532.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
3.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
4.8722-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.8622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
2622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
5622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
5322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 4.87/60 (58th pct league-wide) → 3.91 projected.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 3.86/60 (78th pct league-wide) → 3.25 projected.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.17/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.