Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2670 GP | H240 GP | H130 GP | Prev 3178 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.67 | 13.61 | 12.73 | 13.89 | 14.05 |
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.53 | 1.67 |
| G | ▼9 | 22 | 25 | 19 | 12 |
| A | 14 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 20 |
| PTS | ▼23 | 31 | 36 | 23 | 32 |
| PPP | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| SOG | 123 | 123 | 113 | 136 | 140 |
| PIM | ▼21 | 46 | 39 | 54 | 26 |
| Hits | 55 | 49 | 46 | 53 | 67 |
| Blocks | 44 | 47 | 54 | 37 | 40 |
Sample: 70 GP · 848 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Depth-only in non-faceoff formats; 2025-26 rode shooting luck and a PIM outlier.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (18.70 against 7.10).
PP TOI ran 76% below his 3-year rate last season (0.40 against 1.67).
We’re projecting goals 59% below last season, 22 to 9.
Points ran at a 36 pace in the second half after 23 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.67 | 13.61 | 14.05 | -3% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.82 | 12.12 | 11.35 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.40 | 1.67 | -76% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.79 | 6.79 | 6.74 | +1% |
| G/60 | 0.97 | 1.27 | 0.48 | +165% |
| iSH% | 14.29 | 18.70 | 7.10 | +163% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.84 | 0.71 | +18% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.24 | 12.69 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.85 | 7.60 | +3% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.89 | 3.27 | +19% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.93 | 10.09 | 7.70 | +31% |
| IPP | 61.34 | 60.59 | 62.64 | -3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.57 | -63% |
| 2A/60 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.36 | -61% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.40 | 1.67 | -76% |
| PP iSH% | 13.64 | 20.00 | 11.85 | +69% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.19 | 10.80 | 11.89 | -9% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.29 | 2.34 | -2% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.12 | 2.62 | 1.43 | +84% |
| Hits/60 | 3.24 | 2.83 | 4.16 | -32% |
| Blks/60 | 2.38 | 2.40 | 2.34 | +2% |