Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2666 GP | H240 GP | H126 GP | Prev 3thin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.84 | 12.94 | 12.75 | 12.47 | – |
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 1.16 | – |
| G | 10 | 9 | 14 | 0 | – |
| A | 14 | 12 | 9 | 17 | – |
| PTS | 24 | 21 | 24 | 17 | – |
| PPP | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | – |
| SOG | 113 | 97 | 109 | 78 | – |
| PIM | 47 | 39 | 46 | 28 | – |
| Hits | 11 | 10 | 10 | 9 | – |
| Blocks | 37 | 37 | 29 | 50 | – |
Sample: 66 GP · 778 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 finished the year 91% above where it started (0.47 in the first half, 0.90 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iHDCF/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (1.56 in the first half, 4.35 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 sits in the 2th percentile league-wide (0.62).
We’re projecting points 14% above last season, 21 to 24.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.84 | 12.94 | n/a | |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.97 | 11.79 | n/a | |
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.84 | n/a |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.51 | 5.24 | n/a | |
| G/60 | 0.48 | 0.46 | n/a | |
| iSH% | 8.78 | 8.78 | n/a | |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.72 | n/a | |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.03 | n/a | |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.79 | n/a | |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.24 | n/a |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.10 | 8.10 | n/a | |
| IPP | 51.92 | 51.92 | n/a | |
| 1A/60 | 0.08 | 0.08 | n/a | |
| 2A/60 | 0.54 | 0.54 | n/a |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.84 | n/a | |
| PP iSH% | 12.54 | 12.54 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.44 | 8.61 | n/a | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.42 | n/a |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.43 | 2.08 | n/a | |
| Hits/60 | 0.62 | 0.62 | n/a | |
| Blks/60 | 2.07 | 2.31 | n/a |