🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

David Tomasek

(N/A) · Age 30
(N/A)team
C,RWposition
201position rank
696skater rank
-41overall
-42offense
1peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2622 GPH225-26H122 GPPrev 3thin
TOI10.7610.7610.71
PP TOI1.651.801.80
G111111
A677
PTS171919
PPP677
SOG107112112
PIM383737
Hits646363
Blocks242222

Sample: 22 GP · 195 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Bottom of the league
1A/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (0.00).

We project it down
PPP
622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27

We’re projecting power play points 14% below last season, 7 to 6.

Bottom of the league
5v5 TOI
8.9222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

5v5 TOI sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (8.89).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where David Tomasek is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI10.7610.76n/a
5v5 TOI8.928.89n/a
PP TOI1.651.80n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 6 · 0 · 0
TOI*
9.50Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
9.27Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
0.20Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
10.7622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
8.9222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
1.6522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/606.456.45n/a
G/600.920.92n/a
iSH%14.2614.26n/a
ixG/600.56n/a
iCF/6011.66n/a
iSCF/604.60n/a
iHDCF/602.15n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 6 · 0 · 0
SOG/60
7.55Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
14.30Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
0.79Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
12.95Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
7.55Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
4.32Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
6.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
14.2622-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
11.6622-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
4.6022-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
2.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
10722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%7.147.14n/a
IPP50.0050.00n/a
1A/600.000.00n/a
2A/600.000.00n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 6 · 0 · 0
1A/60
0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 7.1%, IPP 50.0%).

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI1.651.80n/a
PP iSH%0.000.00n/a
PP SOG/6011.1812.15n/a
PP ixG/603.15n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 6 · 0 · 0
PP TOI/GP
0.20Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
1.8022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
12.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
3.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskPP role projected down: 1.8→1.6 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.2 vs 1.8 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.153.07n/a
Hits/605.225.22n/a
Blks/601.961.84n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 6 · 0 · 0
PIMs/60
4.32Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
4.32Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
3.0722-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
5.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
1.8422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
3822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
6422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
2422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 5.22/60 (62nd pct league-wide) → 5.22 projected.
TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 3.24/60 and 2nd-half 2.27 vs a 1.84 season rate (n/a 3-yr) (27th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 1.96/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.
TailwindStrong PIM rate (3.07/60 (83rd pct league-wide)) — a banger-league asset.