Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2666 GP | H233 GP | H133 GP | Prev 381 GP · 1y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.33 | 11.47 | 10.65 | 11.96 | 10.42 |
| PP TOI | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 1.65 | 1.40 |
| G | 20 | 21 | 20 | 22 | 19 |
| A | 8 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 7 |
| PTS | 28 | 31 | 25 | 37 | 26 |
| PPP | 2 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| SOG | 104 | 119 | 114 | 124 | 91 |
| PIM | 15 | 25 | 15 | 35 | 12 |
| Hits | 67 | 66 | 52 | 80 | 69 |
| Blocks | 38 | 41 | 56 | 26 | 28 |
Sample: 66 GP · 679 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Blocks ran at a 56 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI finished the year 79% below where it started (1.64 in the first half, 0.34 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PIMs/60 ran 111% above his 3-year rate last season (1.77 against 0.84).
ixG/60 ran 41% above his 3-year rate last season (0.89 against 0.63).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.33 | 11.47 | 10.42 | +10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.09 | 10.30 | 8.85 | +16% |
| PP TOI | 0.73 | 0.99 | 1.40 | -29% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.33 | 7.33 | 6.19 | +18% |
| G/60 | 1.26 | 1.06 | 1.34 | -21% |
| iSH% | 17.19 | 14.46 | 21.65 | -33% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.89 | 0.63 | +41% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.65 | 12.55 | +17% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.30 | 6.78 | +22% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.68 | 2.85 | +64% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.24 | 10.26 | 10.17 | +1% |
| IPP | 66.52 | 65.22 | 71.64 | -9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.33 | -45% |
| 2A/60 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.25 | +4% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.73 | 0.99 | 1.40 | -29% |
| PP iSH% | 19.97 | 27.25 | 19.97 | +36% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.32 | 10.13 | 7.96 | +27% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.37 | 2.01 | -32% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.29 | 1.77 | 0.84 | +111% |
| Hits/60 | 4.72 | 4.59 | 5.69 | -19% |
| Blks/60 | 3.32 | 2.82 | 2.26 | +25% |