Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H242 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3184 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.19 | 14.48 | 14.20 | 14.14 | 12.22 |
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.90 |
| G | 9 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 8 |
| A | 16 | 17 | 22 | 12 | 16 |
| PTS | 25 | 27 | 30 | 25 | 24 |
| PPP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| SOG | 105 | 99 | 108 | 90 | 119 |
| PIM | 32 | 31 | 29 | 33 | 31 |
| Hits | 48 | 46 | 59 | 33 | 39 |
| Blocks | 54 | 56 | 55 | 57 | 45 |
Sample: 82 GP · 978 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 22 pace in the second half after 12 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits ran at a 59 pace in the second half after 33 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 ran 34% above his 3-year rate last season (0.55 against 0.41).
SOG/60 ran 26% below his 3-year rate last season (5.21 against 7.04).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.19 | 14.48 | 12.22 | +18% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.59 | 11.94 | 10.38 | +15% |
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.90 | -76% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.21 | 5.21 | 7.04 | -26% |
| G/60 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.44 | +11% |
| iSH% | 7.60 | 9.40 | 6.30 | +49% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.72 | 0.74 | -2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.79 | 14.16 | -24% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.81 | 7.69 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.13 | 3.45 | -9% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.55 | 7.99 | 6.87 | +16% |
| IPP | 58.13 | 57.55 | 59.50 | -3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.41 | +34% |
| 2A/60 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.44 | -16% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.90 | -76% |
| PP iSH% | 6.33 | 0.00 | 8.11 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.76 | 6.74 | 13.39 | -50% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.65 | 1.84 | -10% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.75 | 1.66 | 1.82 | -9% |
| Hits/60 | 3.03 | 2.82 | 2.54 | +11% |
| Blks/60 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.67 | -13% |