Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2673 GP | H230 GP | H143 GP | Prev 3209 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.44 | 10.47 | 10.18 | 10.50 | 11.70 |
| PP TOI | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
| G | 8 | 10 | 23 | 1 | 7 |
| A | 9 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 9 |
| PTS | 17 | 18 | 28 | 11 | 17 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 81 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 89 |
| PIM | 77 | 73 | 82 | 67 | 97 |
| Hits | 125 | 119 | 119 | 119 | 158 |
| Blocks | 35 | 39 | 32 | 44 | 40 |
Sample: 73 GP · 683 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 73% above his 3-year rate last season (11.73 against 6.77).
ixG/60 ran 36% above his 3-year rate last season (0.73 against 0.54).
PP TOI sits in the 5th percentile league-wide (0.01).
Blocks ran at a 32 pace in the second half after 44 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 10.44 | 10.47 | 11.70 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.41 | 9.36 | 9.77 | -4% |
| PP TOI | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.26 | -95% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.79 | 5.97 | 5.64 | +6% |
| G/60 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.38 | +84% |
| iSH% | 9.84 | 11.73 | 6.77 | +73% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.73 | 0.54 | +36% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.94 | 10.34 | +16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.41 | 5.14 | +25% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.95 | 2.88 | +37% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.16 | 8.95 | 6.47 | +38% |
| IPP | 57.16 | 56.44 | 59.47 | -5% |
| 1A/60 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 0.35 | -26% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.21 | -12% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.26 | -95% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 9.99 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 10.85 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 2.36 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 6.08 | 5.71 | 7.05 | -19% |
| Hits/60 | 9.57 | 9.22 | 11.37 | -19% |
| Blks/60 | 2.57 | 2.90 | 2.32 | +25% |