Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2674 GP | H240 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3231 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.61 | 15.67 | 15.12 | 14.25 | 16.80 |
| PP TOI | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 1.81 |
| G | 13 | 19 | 24 | 13 | 14 |
| A | 22 | 20 | 17 | 24 | 27 |
| PTS | 35 | 39 | 41 | 36 | 41 |
| PPP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| SOG | 95 | 91 | 101 | 79 | 122 |
| PIM | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 18 |
| Hits | 143 | 127 | 138 | 115 | 181 |
| Blocks | 49 | 57 | 42 | 73 | 68 |
Sample: 74 GP · 882 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 131% above his 3-year rate last season (19.16 against 8.30).
Goals ran at a 24 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI ran 80% below his 3-year rate last season (0.37 against 1.81).
Blks/60 finished the year 57% below where it started (3.62 in the first half, 1.56 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.61 | 15.67 | 16.80 | -7% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.03 | 11.93 | 12.30 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 0.53 | 0.37 | 1.81 | -80% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.22 | 4.28 | 5.32 | -20% |
| G/60 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.44 | +86% |
| iSH% | 12.86 | 19.16 | 8.30 | +131% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.67 | 0.68 | -2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.16 | 9.59 | -15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.78 | 6.17 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.47 | 3.27 | +6% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.07 | 9.52 | 8.45 | +13% |
| IPP | 69.99 | 73.59 | 65.06 | +13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.63 | -35% |
| 2A/60 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.46 | +3% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.53 | 0.37 | 1.81 | -80% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 20.46 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 5.61 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.47 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.80 | -66% |
| Hits/60 | 7.85 | 7.00 | 10.15 | -31% |
| Blks/60 | 2.15 | 2.51 | 2.90 | -13% |