Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2651 GP | H216 GP | H135 GP | Prev 3188 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.49 | 11.99 | 10.40 | 12.43 | 14.29 |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.48 |
| G | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| A | 16 | 14 | 2 | 18 | 21 |
| PTS | 22 | 18 | 3 | 22 | 29 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 88 | 58 | 49 | 65 | 113 |
| PIM | 33 | 14 | 34 | 9 | 50 |
| Hits | 151 | 185 | 200 | 175 | 133 |
| Blocks | 47 | 55 | 46 | 58 | 48 |
Sample: 51 GP · 564 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
1A/60 ran 73% below his 3-year rate last season (0.21 against 0.79).
Hits/60 ran 54% above his 3-year rate last season (12.11 against 7.87).
Blocks ran at a 46 pace in the second half after 58 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting assists 14% above last season, 14 to 16.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.49 | 11.99 | 14.29 | -16% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.97 | 11.07 | 11.81 | -6% |
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.48 | -90% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.72 | 3.72 | 5.89 | -37% |
| G/60 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.30 | -63% |
| iSH% | 4.17 | 2.96 | 5.06 | -42% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.54 | 0.61 | -12% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.82 | 11.68 | -24% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.53 | 6.40 | -14% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.51 | 2.81 | +25% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.46 | 6.91 | 8.85 | -22% |
| IPP | 64.10 | 64.43 | 63.46 | +2% |
| 1A/60 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.79 | -73% |
| 2A/60 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.43 | +48% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.48 | -90% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 14.31 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 4.66 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.64 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.30 | 0.96 | 2.30 | -58% |
| Hits/60 | 11.28 | 12.11 | 7.87 | +54% |
| Blks/60 | 2.61 | 2.87 | 2.21 | +30% |