Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2668 GP | H240 GP | H128 GP | Prev 3246 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.46 | 11.45 | 10.59 | 12.50 | 14.70 |
| PP TOI | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 1.08 | 0.65 |
| G | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| A | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 14 |
| PTS | 18 | 18 | 20 | 16 | 25 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 83 | 81 | 89 | 69 | 133 |
| PIM | 20 | 14 | 11 | 20 | 38 |
| Hits | 55 | 60 | 59 | 62 | 68 |
| Blocks | 35 | 41 | 34 | 50 | 43 |
Sample: 68 GP · 678 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 102% above where it started (3.61 in the first half, 7.30 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 finished the year 73% above where it started (3.88 in the first half, 6.73 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 60% above his 3-year rate last season (0.62 against 0.39).
Blks/60 ran 38% above his 3-year rate last season (2.74 against 1.98).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.46 | 11.45 | 14.70 | -22% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.85 | 9.98 | 11.95 | -16% |
| PP TOI | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.65 | -27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.50 | 5.48 | 6.78 | -19% |
| G/60 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.51 | -32% |
| iSH% | 7.06 | 6.39 | 7.54 | -15% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.60 | 0.63 | -4% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.81 | 13.37 | -27% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.07 | 6.94 | +2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.18 | 2.69 | +18% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.87 | 10.73 | 6.86 | +56% |
| IPP | 49.96 | 48.44 | 59.32 | -18% |
| 1A/60 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.39 | +60% |
| 2A/60 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.27 | +2% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.65 | -27% |
| PP iSH% | 11.61 | 0.00 | 20.02 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 4.48 | 7.50 | 7.53 | -0% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.77 | 1.54 | +15% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.19 | 0.88 | 1.92 | -54% |
| Hits/60 | 3.86 | 4.15 | 3.94 | +5% |
| Blks/60 | 2.40 | 2.74 | 1.98 | +38% |