🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Luke Glendening

PHI · Age 37.3 · 🇺🇸 USA · 5′11″, 190 lb · Undrafted
PHIteam
Cposition
240position rank
819skater rank
-64overall
-61offense
-3peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2670 GPH229 GPH141 GPPrev 3228 GP · 3y
TOI10.4310.5410.5710.3011.47
PP TOI0.040.040.030.090.05
G426-06
A581072
PTS9111579
PPP00000
SOG5759784562
PIM13917436
Hits111114117112122
Blocks5862546859

Sample: 70 GP · 608 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
ixG/60
3-yr 0.531.10Q1Q2Q3Q4

ixG/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (0.36 in the first half, 0.97 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
iHDCF/60
3-yr 2.917.31Q1Q2Q3Q4

iHDCF/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (1.89 in the first half, 5.06 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Below his 3-year rate
PIMs/60
0.7922-2323-2424-2525-26

PIMs/60 ran 72% below his 3-year rate last season (0.79 against 2.80).

Bottom of the league
5v5 TOI
8.8122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

5v5 TOI sits in the 3th percentile league-wide (8.70).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Luke Glendening is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Rick Tocchet (PHI)
Last year (PHI, traded): Sheldon Keefe NJD · pre-trade → Rick Tocchet PHI · acquired mid-season (small sample) — in-season change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI10.4310.5411.47-8%
5v5 TOI8.818.709.14-5%
PP TOI0.040.040.05-14%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 12 · 17
TOI*
3-yr 11.4711.82Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 9.1410.13Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.050.04Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
10.4322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
8.8122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.864.834.12+17%
G/600.270.200.34-42%
iSH%5.744.148.36-50%
ixG/600.640.53+21%
iCF/607.888.82-11%
iSCF/605.225.53-6%
iHDCF/603.552.91+22%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 12 · 17
SOG/60
3-yr 4.126.97Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 8.3610.04Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.531.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 8.8210.80Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 5.5310.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 2.917.31Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.8322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
4.1422-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.6422-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
7.8822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
5.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.5522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
5722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindGoals projected UP: iSH% cratered to 4.1% vs 8.4% 3-yr while 5v5 ixG/60 0.64 (54th pct league-wide) held/rose — the chances say the finishing rebounds toward 5.7%, lifting the goal rate ~35%.
TailwindShot volume up 17% (5v5 SOG/60 4.83 vs 4.12) — volume is the repeatable half, so this raises the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.36→0.97 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.
RiskAge 37 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%6.306.575.18+27%
IPP54.7657.2544.67+28%
1A/600.340.490.09+460%
2A/600.050.100.06+75%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 12 · 17
1A/60
3-yr 0.090.70Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.060.35Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskAssists projected DOWN: on-ice SH% 6.6% (3-yr 5.2%) AND IPP 57.2% (3-yr 44.7%) both ran hot — team finishing + participation luck stacked. Regressing both trims the assist rate ~4%.
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 3.55 vs 2.91) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.040.040.05-14%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/601.450.005.81-100%
PP ixG/603.051.47+107%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 12 · 17
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.050.04Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 5.810.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.470.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
3.0522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.0 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.070.792.80-72%
Hits/608.879.269.45-2%
Blks/603.453.743.37+11%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 12 · 17
PIMs/60
3-yr 2.800.70Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 9.4510.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.371.74Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
0.7922-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
9.2622-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.7422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
1322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
11122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
5822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 9.26/60 (83rd pct league-wide) → 8.87 projected.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.74/60 and 2nd-half 3.68 below the 3.74 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.45/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.37 3-yr mark.